Public evidence, not inference.
NAPR records policy claims only when they can be tied to a public source suitable for independent review.
About NAPR
A narrow question with surprisingly complicated answers.
The No-AI Pledge Registry began with a simple question: which organizations are actually willing to make a comprehensive public commitment not to use artificial intelligence in their business?
Why the registry exists
Public discussion often treats organizations as either “using AI” or “not using AI.” Real policies are more complicated. Some organizations prohibit AI-generated content while using AI elsewhere. Some protect human editorial or creative functions. Others impose disclosure, consent, security, or human-review requirements.
NAPR documents those differences while keeping one unusually strict category — the comprehensive No-AI Pledge — separate and clearly defined.
What NAPR is not
NAPR is not an anti-AI campaign, an AI certification service, or a ranking of “good” and “bad” companies. It is a research registry and policy index built around public evidence.
Who maintains it
NAPR research and verification are maintained by Nocteris. The registry is editorially transparent about that relationship and about the use of technology in building and operating the site.
Corrections
Organizations and readers are encouraged to submit primary-source policies, corrections, scope clarifications, or evidence that an entry should be reclassified.
Policies change.
Records are designed to preserve verification dates, prior versions and future change history rather than treating policy as static.
Research and classification are distinct.
A company can appear in the broader AI Policy Index without qualifying for the comprehensive No-AI Pledge Registry.